Volume 44 (2019)

Issue 1

Tributes to Vicki Lawrence MacDougall

• Karen Eby, Biography, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 1 (2019)
• Von R. Creel, The Portfolios of Professor Emerita Vicki Lawrence MacDougall, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 3 (2019)
• Alvin C. Harrell, Tribute to Vicki Lawrence MacDougall, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 9 (2019)
• Dan Morgan, Vicki MacDougall, Beloved Professor, Mentor, and Friend, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 13 (2019)
• Andrew R. Davis, An OCU Legend: Vicki Lawrence MacDougall, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 29 (2019)

Article

• Mary Watson Smith & Joshua C. Hall, Keeping College Pricey: The Bootlegger and Baptist Story of Higher Education Accreditation, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 33 (2019)

Comment

• Taylor Thompson, Comment, Often No Relief in Post-Conviction Relief, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 67 (2019)

Issue 2

Notes

• William S. Blocker, Note, Trespassing Under the Surface: Does Hydraulically Fracturing Across Boundaries Constitute Actionable Trespass?, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 83 (2019)
• Jessica D. Cox, Note, “Alexa, Are You Listening?”: Using Carpenter and Traditional Property-Based Fourth Amendment Analyses to Determine How Voice Assistant Data Can Be Protected Under the Fourth Amendment, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 117 (2019)
• Andra Q. Holder, Note, Drafting Criminal Direct Appeals in Oklahoma: A Practical Guide, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 151 (2019)
• Alissa Paredes, Note, Shelby County v. Holder: Out with the Old and in with the New, Time for a New Formula, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 183 (2019)

Comments

• Jaycee Booth, Comment, Ridings v. Maze: Should the Oklahoma Supreme Court Loosen the Reins and Allow Recovery for Emotional Distress under the Bystander Theory?, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 221 (2019)
• Joanna Whipple, Comment, Bivens v. State: Is the Process Really “Due”?, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 239 (2019)

Issue 3

Valediction

• Michael T. Gibson, The Challenge, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 257 (2020)

Honorary Member

• Lindsey Pever, Dean Jim Roth, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 261 (2020)

Article

• Greg Eddington, The Oklahoma Constitution’s Single-Subject Rule: The Oklahoma Supreme Court’s Application to Acts of the Legislature, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 265 (2020).

Notes

• Matt Andrus, Note, Protecting Financial Privacy in the FinTech Era: A New Category of Financial Records that Deserve Protection, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 305 (2020)
• Gunner Briscoe, Note, The Doctrine of Chance: Probabilistically Inferring Design, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 335 (2020)

Comments

• Beau Dismukes, Comment, How Does Oklahoma Interpret Double Punishment?, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 365 (2020)
• Annie Ruttkay, Comment, Stand Your Ground Immunity: A Defendant’s Catch-22 Dilemma, 44 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 387 (2020)
• A Note to Our Subscribers