Law Review Issues: Volume 38 (2013)

Fall

Articles

• Michael P. Vargo, Confused by Casey? The Oklahoma Supreme Court’s Puzzling Abortion Rights Decision
• John Rhodes, Up in Smoke: The Religious Freedom Restoration Act and Federal Marijuana Prosecutions

Speech

• The Honorable Diane S. Sykes, The “New Federalism”: Confessions of a Former State Supreme Court Justice

Notes

• Spencer Habluetzel, Is Your Shotgun Sporting?
• Sara Potts, A Double-Edged Sword: Oklahoma’s Transmission Statute and the Lack of Prosecutions for Intentional HIV Transmissions Against Homosexual Males

Summer

Article

• Mark B. Houts, Questioning Authority: Explorations of an Attorney’s Power to Settle in Oklahoma

Speech

• Maxwell J. Mehlman, Extinction by Design

Comments

• Chance Deaton, The Juror Who Knows Too Much: Dealing with Expert Jurors After Ledbetter v. Howard
• Tami Jo Hines, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Heath: Heightened Pleading Standards Dressed in Standing Garb

Spring

Tribute to J. William Conger (full)

• Excerpts from January 7, 2013, Memorial Service
  • Reverend Margaret A. Ball
  • Tom McDaniel
  • Dean Valerie K. Couch
  • Bill King
• Excerpts from January 24, 2013, Celebration of Life
  • James Judd
  • Joni Autrey
  • Drew Neville
• Arthur G. LeFrancois, Thinking of Bill
• Daniel J. Morgan, Bill Conger: Mentor
• Paula Dalley, Bill Conger, the Blind Printer
• Lee F. Peoples, J. William Conger–An Inspiration to China’s Future Trial Lawyers
• Brendan S. Maher, Words of Memory Regarding Bill Conger
• Emma V. Rolls, J. William Conger: The Lagniappe
• Lawrence J. Trautman, Remembering Bill Conger

Articles

• Kieran D. Maye, Jr., Developments of the Law of Expert Testimony in Oklahoma: The Fallacy of the So-Called Non-Novel Exception to Daubert
• Christopher A. Tumminia & Marshall A. Glenn, Ph.D., The Duty to Warn in Oklahoma: A Survey of Law Across Licensed or Certified Psychotherapists

Note

• Sarah Kujawa, Modern-Day Slavery: Human Trafficking in Oklahoma

Comments

• Adam Krejci, Welcome to the Jungle: Gerrymandering and Oklahoma’s Journey into the Redistricting Thicket in Wilson v. State ex re. State Election Board
• Amanda Lilley, The Right to Have a Fool for a Client: Oklahoma’s Standard for Self-Representation as Applied in Mathis v. State