Phyllis E. Bernard, M.A. J.D.
Professor of Law & Founding Director, Oklahoma City University Center on Alternative Dispute Resolution
- B.A. Bryn Mawr College, cum laude
- M.A. Columbia University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
- J.D. University of Pennsylvania Law School
CLICK HERE to read more about Professor Bernard’s extensive background in ADR.[/third_left][twothirds_right]Oklahoma City University’s curriculum offers solid pedagogy on the role of the lawyer as advocate in negotiation, mediation and arbitration — used as a adjunct to or in lieu of civil litigation.
The Center on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) took an early lead in teaching the emerging law of ADR: legal ethics, civil procedure, evidence, contract law, torts and remedies as these doctrines impact decision-making.
Our experienced team comes from a wide variety of backgrounds and areas of expertise: Team Members
Team members and alumni have written extensively on topics relating to ADR. Please visit our Publications page.
Our team members are continuously involved in ADR seminars and other related events. Please visit our Recent Activity page for current events in ADR.
Undoing the “Done” Deal and Adding Value to Client Representation
The foundation course The Law of Alternative Dispute Resolution provides students a solid framework for sophisticated problem-solving from a client-centered approach and the strategic use of ADR processes. The Law of ADR is a semester-long course in the hottest underlying issue for attorneys:
- What issues and practices that can “undo the ‘done’ deal?”
- How do we add value for our client through our representation – in ways that build a lasting law practice?
- How do we protect ourselves against direct or collateral attack by persons seeking to attack the settlement?
If a law student has room in their schedule for only one course on ADR – this is the one to take. This in-depth coverage will NOT be offered in a CLE workshop. In addition, the format of the Law of ADR provides multiple opportunities to practice skills of legal analysis and writing that form the core of day-to-day law practice. Students will prepare attorney work products such as:
- Case notes to the client file
- Intra-office legal memoranda
- Client opinion letters
This course, as many graduates have described, helped them review and integrate learning from a broad range of basic courses and shift from thinking like a law student to thinking like a lawyer. Because of the problem-solving approach and writing exercises, when presented with a real case in law practice, they not only knew the theory but how to put those theories to work. They could “hit the ground running.”
Certificate in ADR Advocacy
National Institute for Trial Advocacy Curriculum in ADR Advocacy
Students who have completed the foundation course in ADR doctrine can take any one of the three skills-oriented courses based on curricula developed by the highly regarded National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA). Students who complete all three Client Representation courses qualify for the Law School’s Certificate in Client Representation in Alternative Dispute Resolution. The course are:
Client Representation in Negotiation (including Interviewing and Counseling)
This course teaches step-by-step the building blocks of successful lawyer-client communication: how to listen for not only what is said but, as importantly, what is not said; how to interview a client in a way that builds trust and openness, while obtaining the information to build the decision-tree of options under the law; how to counsel so that the client and the lawyer have a clear, mutual understanding about the options available, risks and potential rewards, as a matter of law – not merely game theory; and how to negotiate on behalf of one’s client in settlement conferences, outside the presence of a third-party neutral.
Client Representation in Mediation
This course intersects with – but can be taken independently of or concurrently with – Client Representation in Negotiation. The Mediation skills course teaches a facilitative, problem-solving approach following the mediation advocacy style used in the ABA Dispute Resolution Section’s national competition. This course focuses primarily on how to work with one’s client, with opposing parties and with the third-party neutral in a more collaborative way than is taught in almost any other setting. At the same time, students are encouraged to maintain their full range of advocacy skills; keeping in mind that the lawyer’s duty to represent their client’s best interests requires the flexibility to employ a range of approaches.
Client Representation in Arbitration
This course teaches the nuts and bolts of preparing, presenting, and challenging an arbitration process or award. Arbitration is the ADR method that most resembles litigation. It is, however, more than “litigation lite.” In some ways, the stakes are even higher than in trial court, because there is little chance for judicial review of decisions made in the arbitration process or the award itself. The arbitration advocate, therefore, must pay special attention to the details of process and presentation, especially since many arbitration hearings are “on paper” rather than in person. Attorneys who excel in arbitration combine an understanding of industry custom and the applicable law to create concise, convincing works of oral and written advocacy. This course provides students multiple opportunities to practice that winning combination, taking a simulated case from start to finish.
The Value of ADR Training to the Community
Clinical skills are taught through active listening, calming techniques, and reframing to identify common ground through problem solving skills needed by all attorneys, especially our law students in clinics. Not only are student mediators helping families, clinic students are learning to interview not interrogate. We focus on a respectful client-centered approach by practicing professionalism with compassion while understanding there are facts in the feelings.
For More Information